Thursday, 8 November 2012

'The Children's Crusade' - Revolution, Season One

Revolution
Season One
Episode Seven
'The Children's Crusade' - 2.0

It's not a good sign when I end up feeling sorry for the good actors caught up in this mess. 
Ok, so perhaps last episode's enjoyable experience was a one-off event. 'The Children's Crusade' returned to the predictable, politically correct, horribly written shit that perpetuated the first five episodes of the season. 

To be simple and - hopefully - concise, there are kids who have no parents and they are cute and no one dies. The kids’ leader is taken by the Militia and a guilty Miles decides to let his idealistic niece infiltrate some recruitment ship and rescue the leader. I'm sure I've said it before but these idiots deserve to die horribly, even though they won't. Hell, even Grace isn't dead after being kidnapped by 'Randall'.

On that note, the bright light of this episode came from Elizabeth Mitchell getting some more screen time. Mitchell has always been fantastic, and Rachel's pregnancy woes gave her plenty of room to stretch her muscles of actingness. Her reaction to her unborn baby's malady was realistic and touching, and I believed the performances of both her and of Ben Matheson. I also appreciated her initial collapse, as Rachel falls to the sidewalk with her hand to her belly begging desperately for assistance, and it just goes to show how great the actress is at portraying a woman dealing with her own or someone else's pregnancy. It's a very bizarre typecast, but it definitely works for her.

In the modern time, we also get to see Mitchell portray a morally ambiguous character once again, as she tries to trick a former friend into giving her the location of the pendants. It was a very well filmed sequence, as was the reveal of the prisoner's daughter later on, which establishes this poor guy as a less fortunate parallel to Rachel. Her break down as she realised what she'd brought about was pretty damn depressing, and a testament to one of the two strong actors on the show. The other is Giancarlo Esposito, by the way.

A weak actor is Billy Boyd, or whatever, who continues to fail his deliver and conviction in playing a troubled anti-hero. I don't believe that he has the sort of fury and determination that allows someone to be that good at fighting and swordplay. There's just no fire, nothing that makes me accept that this guy got a job without sleeping with somebody or paying someone a whole chunk of money. I can see that Tracy Spiridakos is able, if not always willing, to play the role of Charlie, I just wonder if she relates better to the more badass side to the character, as when she's being moral and typically heroic she can't sell it well. For the good of the show they clearly need to make Charlie an anti-hero like her uncle, and then they can get rid of Miles and get on with the story in style.

Putting children in the middle of the action is ultimately an easy way to evoke an emotional connection, similarly, Rachel's pregnancy troubles. At least the latter was well executed, because the actual 'Children's Crusade' was horribly acted and presented. I just didn't care, I could see that it wasn't real and I knew that the children would succeed. They're fucking children in Revolution, they aren't like sweet little girls in The Walking Dead. They are in absolutely no danger whatsoever. I don't think I can stand this predictability! 

And that's pretty much how I feel about Revolution. Shit. I don't like it anymore, the episode wasn't any fun, the characters suck ass, the plot is uninteresting and a promising premise is wasted by worthless writers and directors. Why don't you do something? 

No comments:

Post a Comment