666 Park Avenue
Season One
Episode One
‘Pilot’ – 6.0
666 Park Avenue
Season One
Episode One
‘Pilot’ – 6.0
I’ve been
taking somewhat of a break from writing my pieces recently, which I admit is an
interesting thing to do at this time of year, with almost every returning show
reappearing around now. It’s not my fault though, since I’m actually in the
complex and highly overrated process of shifting my place of residence
somewhere new, and the lack of a functioning cable receiver, bluray player, DVR
or television have been hampering my repeated attempts to get back in the game.
Yeah, that has put me behind. Yeah, it means none of my recaps have gone up
yet. Yeah, like you give a shit.
In my first
writing day for nearly two weeks, I am bringing to you a recap of the first
episode from new horror drama 666 Park Avenue. Set in a New York apartment
building, this adaption of Gabriella Pierce’s novel of the same name is no
doubt hinged on the success of fellow genre-buddy ‘American Horror Story’, who
came to be last year and brought horror into the realm of possibility on
television. That said, I should mention how difficult it would be not to
compare these two shows with one another, and thus I can’t be bothered trying
not to. Obvious question; which is better? Less obvious answer; I just can’t
tell yet.
If you
consider what is probably the most important thing in this genre; actually
being scared, FYI; American Horror Story definitely takes the cake. 666 has a
few moments that got me a little but it lacked that pervasive sense of suspense
and dread that made AHS so enthralling. However, the reason AHS was so scary
was that it was unbelievably over-the-top, throwing any semblance of restraint
or common sense so far out of the window it became entirely irretrievable, and
this allows the viewer to legitimately feel like anything could – and would –
happen over the course of the show. 666 seems to have morals and boundries,
choosing to be almost completely devoid of violence or sex; those two aspects
of horror that can be so easily used to manipulate our fear. Perhaps it isn’t
so much morals, rather it would be the guiding hand of free-to-air network
executives. You have to worry about this sort of thing, I guess, if you want to
garner the attention of the general public, despite this being a horror show
that risks alienating the fans of horror shows. Wow, did you get that?
So what
exactly is this show about? Well, 999 Park Avenue is a residential hotel in the
fancy part of New York, and it is a quite attractive building. I’m no
architecture-fanatic - I actually like
the look of Fed Square – but this haunted masterpiece is pretty breathtaking,
though that’s just a case of excellent location scouting. Anyway, in the first
sequence we meet the building’s pre-main couple residential manager, who’s
ambitions seem to converge on the thought of being a symphonic violinist,because
that just founds epic fun. Whatever though, cause as he plays under the
watchful eyes of the show’s obvious antagonistic couple – Lost’s Terry O’Quinn
and Desperate Housewives’ Vanessa Williams – the tips of our musician’s
plucking fingers begin to split open just a little bit, dripping blood onto his
sheet music and his nice shoes. The bad guys are loving this of course.
Later the
clearly ill-fated muso returns to his flat at 999 Park Avenue, packing his bags
and smashing his violin against the dresser. He tries to run out the door, only
to have it shut on him as he receives a call from O’Quinn, who totally says
some shit. Scary shit, I’m sure. Admittedly, I just wanted to see this man
murdered violently, only because my brain was freaking out thinking that it was
inevitable. Sure enough, he does die, but not particularly shockingly. I was a
little surprised, but it was no scary end; violinman (the world’s least
interesting superhero) manages to break his way out of the building’s
intricately designed double door entrance, only for that oh-so-familiar
imminent-death cue to play just as he falls to his knees in relief. Seconds
later he’s sucked through a little viewing hole and out of our show. To be
honest, it was fairly nerve-wracking; until he was eaten by a door. Right,
cause, that’s just full of sense right there. Couldn’t he have exploded or
something? 999 Park Avenue is scary because it ABSORBS its victims? You do
that, TV, I won’t stop you. I won’t like it, but I won’t stop you.
I didn’t
realise what a profound effect that somewhat disappointing first death would
have on my overall viewing experience. Initially I did think it was a bit silly
– and not in a good horror-movie implausibility way – but it almost entirely
vacuum-sucked the tension out of this show. Thankfully, there are actually a
few other things going for it.
Our real
protagonists, and the new resident managers are Jane Van Veen and Henry Martin,
played by Australian Rachael Taylor and Dave Annable respectively, who offer a
younger and more attractive look than what was seen in AHS. Oddly though, this
slight advantage was not really used at all, and at their most seductive we see
Taylor apparently naked in a bath tub. A sexy girl, sure, but they could have
taken advantage of it. Another actress, Helena Mattsson – who has far too many
adjacent double letters in her last name – is asked to strip off for the
camera, which makes a bizarre decision to pan up a little, preventing visible
boobage. I’m not complaining too much, it was just a bit surprising for a
horror show to resist getting a little post-PG. DAMN YOU PARENT GROUPS. Some
shows can have nudity. We aren’t all frigid old people with sheltered children!
The most
interesting plot of the night did actually involve Mattsson. Taylor and Annable
didn’t really do much, other than fuss over the house and get ever so subtly
manipulated by Locke and Vanessa Williams. If you were wondering. Regardless,
Mattsson plays Alexis, a voyeuristic whore who enjoys being ogled at by Brian
Leonard, a flailing playwright portrayed by Robert Buckley who lives in 666 and
is able to see Alexis’ apartment. His wife is Louise Leonard, who suffers in
the episodes best scene; Only minutes after Brian watched Alexis remove her
silken dressing gown to reveal off-camera bosoms, the married couple are caught
in an elevator mishap. Their downward journey had been short, but somewhat
unexpecting, culminating in Louise getting struck by a premature closing of the
lift doors. I was honestly surprised, and watching the heavy metal barricade
shut on the poor woman again and again was actually incredibly painful to
watch. There was a very brief moment of real suspense when the lift clearly
began to rise back up again, and I was momentarily sure that she was about to
be torn in half. However, the next shot shows her back on the floor again, all
of her in one piece. Not quite sure what happened there, but it didn’t matter,
I enjoyed it. If it matters, she’s not dead.
For another
character, they don’t get out of the night’s happenings so easily. His name is
John Barlow, and it is established early on that he is a recent widower, with a
very nosy Jane quickly discovering that Mrs. Barlow had died in a mental
institution. In an understated and tense scene, the ghost of this woman appears
behind Jane as she fiddles with a light globe, before vanishing into the
darkness and emerging alive on the bed of her widowed husband. Gavin explains
to John that his wife’s return is a rented life, and that payments need to be
made. He orders the poor guy to murder two men, but he flakes on the third and
Gavin returns his insolence with more getting-eaten-by-the-building. I won’t be
so utterly bereft of fear about this bizarre method of death if you kill one of
the protagonists with a spontaneous devouring-by-house. Maybe Jane can be
chewed up by a water heater!
In all
truth, nothing much else really happened. I’m already sick to death of the
building itself, though I hope that it causes more lift-door accidents, that
was fantastic. It was really the only point in the episode that had me tense –
though the finger slicing in the cold open was getting there. The performances
are passable, though I haven’t seen enough to judge properly. I wouldn’t say
any actors jumped out in either good or bad ways, and I can see Taylor taking
Jane far over the course of the series. O’Quinn and Williams are quite
effective as the evil hearts of this tale, but from personal experience I have
learnt that evil is the easiest personality trait to pull off to an audience.
EVIL LAUGHTER CUED AND DELIVERED.
The
cinematography is pretty typical of a horror, though it appears to be somewhat
less inclined to pull evasive techniques just to keep us on our toes. For
example, we don’t get close ups that obscure the entire frame to increase
claustrophobia, which is a welcome change, though it once again makes 666 seem
less like a horror and more like a standard network drama. Not necessarily a
bad thing, though I hope they can pull in the normal audience like they seem to
be trying to. Musically, I only really noticed anything in the cold open, which
was scored with a nice orchestral piece, a motif of the show it seems as a
symphony manages to make a repeat appearance. I’m certainly not antsy,
classical music is always a step ahead of synthesiser-based scores that you get
in shows like ‘the Vampire Diaries’. We all should note how important the music
is in a horror film. Yes, Joss Whedon may note that the score manipulates us
into feeling set emotions when we should really be experiencing everything the
way we want to, but in a horror we need to be scared, and little does that
better than a terrific, over-the-top musical cue. For now, 666 seems to
understand that.
I’ll
definitely tune in some more, though exactly how long the show is able to keep
me intrigued is yet to be seen. Fingers crossed!
No comments:
Post a Comment